Word has been given to The Project School, one of Indianapolis' charter schools, that they will be be having their charter revoked. The revocation will take effect immediately; no classes will begin at the school this fall.
According to an Indianapolis Star story, the charter is being revoked for multiple reasons. The school was one of the worst performing schools not only in the county, but in the entire state. Only 29% of the school's students passed the ISTEP.
Perhaps
just as troubling is the extreme financial issues the school is
having. The school apparently was bouncing payroll checks. The
reports also states that the school misused large amounts of federal
funds as well as accumulating three million dollars in debt.
The
revoking of the charter, at least according to the details of the
Star's story, seems to be a fully acceptable. It also goes to
show one of the benefits of the expansion of charter schools recently
in Indiana: the ability to hold the school accountable with extreme
consequences.
This
is the way schools across our state should operate. If they
fail to meet the most basic requirements then they should be at risk
of being closed. The
growth of charter schools makes this more likely to occur. The
addition of voucher programs makes consequences even more likely, as
parents would be unwilling to allow their children to continue to
attend schools that so horribly fail.
Over
the next days or weeks we will undoubtedly learn more details about
what exactly was happening at The Project School. For now,
though, it seems that some of the safety nets in place with our
charter school system have enabled Mayor Ballard to get rid of a bad
apple before it could do any more damage.
(If
you are interested in learning more about charter schools, voucher
programs, and school choice, The Friedman Foundation for Educational
Choice will be holding the Friedman Legacy for Freedom Day at the
Conrad Hotel in downtown Indianapolis on Friday, July 27th. Please
contact Chris Spangle for more information.)
"When the government's boot is on your throat, whether it is a left boot or a right boot is of no consequence." – Gary Lloyd
Showing posts with label Chris Spangle. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chris Spangle. Show all posts
Thursday, July 19, 2012
Monday, October 24, 2011
It's Time for "Indiana Week in Review" to Add a Libertarian to the Panel
Indiana Week in Review has had a wonderful discussion on Indiana news and happenings, mostly of a political nature, for twenty years now. The show is moderated by Jim Shella, and uses four panel members to interject their point-of-view on the goings-on of the Hoosier State each week. The current regular panel members are: Mike McDaniel, former chair of the Indiana Republican Party; Ann DeLaney, former chair of the Indiana Democratic Party; Jon Schwantes of Dispatch Broadcasting; and John Ketzenberger of the Indiana Fiscal Policy Institute.
On that episode (You can find audio of that episode here. The Rupert coverage begins at 13:02,) a few things really stood out to me. First, the discussion it received seemed to laugh off the (then) potential candidate. Second, it felt like the panelists, for one reason or another, were scared to tackle both the Rupert subject and the viability of the Libertarian Party. Third, the members of the panel showed very little knowledge of how Indiana law works in respect to parties other than the Republicans and Democrats.
(You see, everything from party conventions to ballot access to primaries...everything, really...works vastly different if you're not an R or a D. Little tricks the two major parties have made laws on to keep it so they are the only likely players in most races. Even in races where a third party candidate is present, the laws make it very difficult for the non-major candidate to have a fair shake.)
Because of Rupert's (then) potential candidacy, I decided to comment on Shella's blog, asking him when the show planned to add a Libertarian to the panel. Shella replied,
Well, guess what, Mr. Shella...you know now. As of two days ago, there is a Libertarian challenging seriously for a statewide office. And not just any statewide office, but THE statewide office...the race for Indiana Governor. For at least the next twelve months, Indiana's Libertarian Party and Rupert Boneham will be constant fixtures in the news of Indiana's politics.
If you are looking for suggestions, I have a few. At the top of that list is the current Executive Director of the Indiana Libertarian Party, Chris Spangle. Spangle is well-informed and well-spoken. Add in Spangle's current role in the state's Libertarian Party, and his fit for a IWIR panel position seems clear.
Aside from Spangle, other options should include the Libertarian's State Chair, Sam Goldstein. Yet another option would be former Congressional candidate and regular speaker for Libertarian ideals, Sean Shepard.
Things just changed for the Indiana Libertarian Party. Every discussion of Indiana politics, especially the 2012 Governor's race, will now mention Rupert Boneham and the Libertarian Party. It's now time for Indiana's political news show to change as well.
![]() |
| Jim Shella (from IWIR website) |
Last Monday, Shella posted a blog commemorating the 20th anniversary of the show. The same day, Rupert Boneham's campaign issued a statement that Rupert would be announcing his gubernatorial decision on Saturday (my story here). The combination of these events reminded me of a conversation that was held on the first IWIR episode after Boneham announced he was forming an exploratory committee for the Governor's race.
On that episode (You can find audio of that episode here. The Rupert coverage begins at 13:02,) a few things really stood out to me. First, the discussion it received seemed to laugh off the (then) potential candidate. Second, it felt like the panelists, for one reason or another, were scared to tackle both the Rupert subject and the viability of the Libertarian Party. Third, the members of the panel showed very little knowledge of how Indiana law works in respect to parties other than the Republicans and Democrats.
(You see, everything from party conventions to ballot access to primaries...everything, really...works vastly different if you're not an R or a D. Little tricks the two major parties have made laws on to keep it so they are the only likely players in most races. Even in races where a third party candidate is present, the laws make it very difficult for the non-major candidate to have a fair shake.)
Because of Rupert's (then) potential candidacy, I decided to comment on Shella's blog, asking him when the show planned to add a Libertarian to the panel. Shella replied,
"We have no current plans to add a Libertarian. It is a statewide show and without a Libertarian challenging seriously for any statewide offices that would be difficult to justify."I don't know, of course, if Shella had yet received word of Boneham's Saturday announcement. If he had, even as predictable as the outcome of Saturday's press conference was, he had no way to know for sure what Rupert was going to say.
Well, guess what, Mr. Shella...you know now. As of two days ago, there is a Libertarian challenging seriously for a statewide office. And not just any statewide office, but THE statewide office...the race for Indiana Governor. For at least the next twelve months, Indiana's Libertarian Party and Rupert Boneham will be constant fixtures in the news of Indiana's politics.
![]() |
| Chris Spangle Executive Director Libertarian Party of Indiana |
So now I resubmit my question to Jim Shella and the others at Indiana Week in Review: when will you add a Libertarian to your panel? The time to do so is now, and I challenge you to accept that. I encourage you to take steps to very quickly have a voice of the state's third largest party represented on your show.
![]() |
| Sean Shepard |
Things just changed for the Indiana Libertarian Party. Every discussion of Indiana politics, especially the 2012 Governor's race, will now mention Rupert Boneham and the Libertarian Party. It's now time for Indiana's political news show to change as well.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


